MANILA — A policy regulating tattoos among personnel and applicants of the Philippine National Police (PNP) is under scrutiny for lacking legal foundation, according to a statement from Manila Representative Joel Chua.
According to Philippines News Agency, current laws, including Republic Act (RA) 6713, which sets the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, and RA 6975 that established the PNP, do not prohibit tattoos. Chua emphasized that the PNP's restrictions on tattoos are absent from the general qualifications for appointment listed under Section 30 of RA 6975. He also argued that the policy infringes on constitutional freedoms as tattoos represent a form of artistic expression protected under the right to free expression. "The PNP should discard that policy now before they face legal challenges for its unconstitutionality," Chua stated.
During a press conference at Camp Crame in Quezon City, PNP spokesperson Colonel Jean Fajardo explained that the policy requires personnel with visible tattoos to have them removed, citing the need for a professional appearance in uniform. The policy, detailed in Memorandum Circular 2024-023, also mandates that officers with tattoos that are not visible file an affidavit. However, aesthetic tattoos such as those used for eyebrows, eyeliner, or lips are exempt from this rule.
Chua criticized the policy as a negative perception of individuals with tattoos and stated that tattoos should only be a concern if they signify active participation in a criminal organization. He further noted that the policy could unjustly affect former convicts who have reintegrated into society post-incarceration, as current laws promote restorative justice.
The lawmaker also highlighted potential health risks associated with the mandatory removal of tattoos, pointing out the danger of infection. Meanwhile, Fajardo mentioned that the PNP Health Service would issue recommendations on how to safely remove visible tattoos.
Chua also pointed out the disparity in policy applications, noting that unlike the PNP, the Supreme Court does not prohibit judges from having tattoos, referencing a ruling from September 29, 2021. "It is disappointing that our PNP maintains this negative mindset about people with tattoos," Chua concluded.